MAILBOX: Let's All Pitch In To Buy Sharp Blades For Our Executioners
Dear Dean:
Well, well, well. Bunch of enlightened souls we Jews are, with our electoral preferences, aren't we now?
"Martin Indyk (Director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution), along with Council of Foreign Relations President Richard Hass, recently provided the foreword and first chapter to Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President. Indyk was [a] strong and visible supporter of Barack Obama's during the campaign who assured Jewish audiences of Barack Obama's strong support for Israel."
Refreshing, isn't it? Isn't our peculiar brand of elitist self-loathing just grand? Aren't we the savvy ones, making common cause with our enemies out of ignorance? Oh yeah, these folks we have supported for so long out of kindness, or pity, or whatever emotion we've intellectually talked ourselves into with our twisted internal dialog can really turn tail, can't they? Boy, are we one enlightened bunch or what? We sure know how to vote those fine Democrats in, we're always thinking about how truthful they are, what selfless public servants they are, and how they've tirelessly supported Israel.
But wait, Obama appointed Rahm Emanuel as his Chief of Staff, that proves he's not anti-Semitic. Wow, the brilliance of this insight just leaves us conservatives scratching the heads surrounding our shriveled little neanderthal brains in confusion, doesn't it? Where did we go wrong?
Congratulations, my fellow Jews, nice job on that voting thingy. What's next, shall we pool our resources and see if we can get a wholesale deal on fine German cutlery to donate to the poor suffering Muslims in Palestine, so when they cut our throats, they'll have nice sharp blades and at least it will be quick?
A.P.
December 7, 2008 12:38:49 PM PST
Well, well, well. Bunch of enlightened souls we Jews are, with our electoral preferences, aren't we now?
"Martin Indyk (Director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution), along with Council of Foreign Relations President Richard Hass, recently provided the foreword and first chapter to Restoring the Balance: A Middle East Strategy for the Next President. Indyk was [a] strong and visible supporter of Barack Obama's during the campaign who assured Jewish audiences of Barack Obama's strong support for Israel."
Refreshing, isn't it? Isn't our peculiar brand of elitist self-loathing just grand? Aren't we the savvy ones, making common cause with our enemies out of ignorance? Oh yeah, these folks we have supported for so long out of kindness, or pity, or whatever emotion we've intellectually talked ourselves into with our twisted internal dialog can really turn tail, can't they? Boy, are we one enlightened bunch or what? We sure know how to vote those fine Democrats in, we're always thinking about how truthful they are, what selfless public servants they are, and how they've tirelessly supported Israel.
But wait, Obama appointed Rahm Emanuel as his Chief of Staff, that proves he's not anti-Semitic. Wow, the brilliance of this insight just leaves us conservatives scratching the heads surrounding our shriveled little neanderthal brains in confusion, doesn't it? Where did we go wrong?
Congratulations, my fellow Jews, nice job on that voting thingy. What's next, shall we pool our resources and see if we can get a wholesale deal on fine German cutlery to donate to the poor suffering Muslims in Palestine, so when they cut our throats, they'll have nice sharp blades and at least it will be quick?
A.P.
December 7, 2008 12:38:49 PM PST
Dear Dean,
If a Muslim hires an Orthodox Jew, does that make the Muslim any less anti-semitic? All Muslims are not anti-semites. However, Obama is not just a muslim, but an anti-semite as well. I do not trust the man as far as I can throw him.
How is it that the Rabbi's are in agreement on the fact that Obama is a Muslim that is not to be trusted? He stated on the campaign trail that he plans to implement Shariah Law in America. And not a month after being elected, he stated that it would be one of his goals after he swears in to institute Shariah Law. If this does not make a Jew sudder, nothing will.
The only thing that the Palestinians beleive in is murdering innocent people. Why can't people see that?
There are many Judicial Cases awaiting at teh Supreme Court Level demanding that Obama remit his orginal birth certificate. He Obama does not, then nothing he does as President of the US will be valid, none of the laws that the US Congress passes will be valid and nothing that the Judicial Branch does will be valid until he does.
Shalom, Yacov
Reply to this
Dear Yacov,
I am committed to allowing most posts to appear on this site unedited. Even when the posts contain misinformation, dare I even say lies and libelous opinion, I'm inclined to permit them because I want people to be free to express their beliefs.
You have commented multiple times on this site and I am grateful. My ego is always stoked when someone takes the time to comment on my posts. That said, however, I must publicly distance myself from this comment of yours.
We do our cause no service by propagating misinformation. If you have sources to back up some of your outrageous remarks, please cite them. I have followed the Obama campaign very closely and have never seen an instance where he states that he plans to implement Shariah Law. Also, unless I see objective evidence to the contrary, I believe calling him a Muslim is horrid. (He certainly does not practice Islam, even if as a child he was exposed to it.)
I don't like President-Elect Obama and I fear that he is no friend of Israel. Any friend of Israel would not sit and listen to the utterances of Rhashid Khalidi and Khalidi's anti-Semitic pals without speaking up and walking out. But I don't have to invent allegations about Obama to make my case. The undisputed facts are in plain view, for anyone who is willing to see TRUTH.
I know you believe what you say. I know you seek to defend Israel from terrorists and terrorist supporters. I ask only if you wish to make allegations about President-Elect Obama and others here, you provide objective, substantiation for your assertions.
I pray that Hashem will give you the wisdom to channel your energy and passion along the path that will be most effective. Comments such as these are a diversion from that path.
DEAN
Reply to this
Dear Mr. Rotbart,
I have followed Mr. Obama's campaign very closely as well. I have heard from Mr. Obama's mouth as President-Elect that bringing Shariah Law to America is exactly what he plans to do. Mr. Obama may not have stated it in thsoe two words, but listen very carefully and you will know. Listen to his financial advisors and you will know. He and his advisors have even mentioned it on TV. At least one of them mentioned by the term "Shariah Law."
The Muslims call Mr. Obama the Messiah as stated by America's Mr. Muslim, Louis Farrakhan. The Muslim's have an old prophecy that a black man from the west would rise with the most powerful Army ever on this earth and he would be their friend and ally and to not be deceived. The prophecy also contains the fact that he would be a muslim. There is also the issue that will not go away. Is he a natural born citizen or not? There is no evidence of this and Obama has yet to prove it one way or the other...yet, please see what the US Supreme Court is deciding about that.
As far as Mr. Obama practicing Islam, his place of worship, while legally a "christian place of worship", is not considered to be christian by American Christian Theologians that are Conservative and/or Evangelical in nature. If you would listen to a few of the sermons that his so caleld "pastor" preached and then compare that to an Radical Muslim, I can guarantee you that you yourself would not find much of a difference. I have and they sent chills up and down my spine as I could not tell the difference between them. While Mr. Obama's church is legally a church, my Evangelical Christian friends have cringed at watching the same video's.
Are you aware that while there a literally thousands of places of worship in America that are legally listed as "christian", but are actually mosque's in disguise? Are you aware that are at least a few synagogues that are legally called that, but are actually mosque's in disguise?
I think that it is reasonable to assume that many people are unaware of these facts that can be easily investigated. These statements have been made public verbally at least by many people in the christian community.Federal Law Enforcement Officials are well aware of this.
The reason for the above to be true is only one. The muslims know that they cannot take this country over from without - only from within. What better way to do it than to "get into the enemies own camp."
I do not have to invent any allegations either. That is a big no no in my book, too. However, I can understand why one might think that since it sounds so preposterous that it cannot be true. Yet, true it is. Some of the muslims in America are attempting to destroy America as well as Europe. I implore you to take a good look at the immigration pattern. A myrtle is still a myrtle even in a sea of reeds. That saying is true whether Jewish or not.
Is this enough of sources for you?
Yacov
Reply to this
Dear Yacov: I am a trained investigative journalist. Even now, I am working to expose some wrong-doing that pertains to the Obama election campaign. If I can find facts to support serious allegations, I will expose them.
If Obama or his staff endorsed Shariah Law, I need to know who/when/where. Give me a date. Give me a specific. If you don't know, perhaps someone else reading this does.
If there are thousands of Christian churches in America that are actually mosques, give me the names and addresses of only ten. Same for those synagogues that are secretly mosques.
Fact can be investigated. What you say either is or is not true. Give me some specifics and I will investigate them.
As for the "church" that Obama attended in Chicago, we agree that it might as well have been a mosque given what his preacher preached. But it didn't host prayer services 5 times a day and it didn't lead services from a Koran.
If you are saying that Obama is a Muslim as a metaphor, you are entitled to that view. If you are saying he is a practicing Muslim, I will need more concrete proof.
Some of your biblical wisdom is really literary. "A myrtle is still a myrtle even in a sea of reeds," is very poetic. Even though the investigative journalist in mean remains unconvinced, the writer in me is appreciative of your means of expressing your views.
Write me again when you gather some specifics or encourage those who have evidence to show it to me.
DEAN
Reply to this
Dear Mr. Rotbart,
Please look back at the press releases since Mr. Obama was President-Elect. He and his staff stated it in DC at the President-Elect's Podium with many Democratic and very liberal Reporters right there on scene. These statements were made before Thanskgiving week, if my memory serves me correct. Also, please look specifically for the day that they mentioned Shariah Law Financial System had already come to America since the 1970's. That Institution has already been here.
As for the list of churches, please contact me directly and privately to keep the sources private, at least for now.
Even Saddam Hussein was not a practicing muslim. He made that claim for political purposes, the Arab community and for power.
Thank you sir. You are a first to make mention that I am poetic in any sense. I give the credit to a very wise sage as I quoted Rashi to make my point. I do not make a claim that writing is a skill that I have mastered. Public speaking, well, that is not only much easier to do it is also something that I enjoy doing.
Reply to this
Dear Mr. Rotbart,
Since you are a trained investigative reporter, you should know the following statement is a true statement.
In a court of law, when someone makes allegations of one party and the other perty does not respond to each allegation, Judicially speaking, it is reasonable to assume that the allegations are true and correct.
In Berg va Obama, Mr. Berg makes roughly 50 or so allegations. Obama and his legal team did not respond to the any of the allegations. One of those allegations was that he gave up his citizenship when he attended school in Indonesia as Indonesia does not do the dual citizenship thing. In order to attend school in Indonesia, Obama had to be listed as a muslim. Therefore, Mr. Obama has admitted in a court of law that he is a muslim and that he is not eligible to be President of the US as according to the US Constitution. Mr. Obama's family in Kenya states that Obama is a muslim.
The US Supreme Court, as of this writing, is determining whether or not to hear the case and to combine many other cases as well into one lawsuit. These lawsuits are from many states. Whether or not we like Mr Obama personally or as a Presidential candidate, EVERY US CITIZEN should desire that any Presidential candidate prove that they are indeed qualified for the Office of President. If it is found out after Obama takes the Oath for the Office of President of the US that he is indeed not qualified, the US is in a world of hurt, Judicially, Legislatively, and Executively. Everything that he does would have to be undone, but how do you do that? Another Civil War? I would hope not. The Founding Fathers of this Great Nation would be Ressurected back to life if they knew that the US Military had to seize control of the US Government for any reason.
Please remember that the US Military swears or affirms an Allegiance to the US Constitution first and foremost before doing so to the Orders of the President of the US. Mr. Obama could end this Constitutional Crises if he chose to do so very easily by providing his long form birth certificate, his college records, etc...
If any rational person can see where this can lead to.
There is also a thought that those in power are well aware of Mr. Obama's citizenship issue and are aiding and abetting this situation to create a new nation such as combining Canada, Mexico and the US to combat the rise of the EU. I do not know. If Mr. Alan Keyes takes issue with Mr. Obama then I think that it is reasonable to assume that there is a major kink in the system. Mr. Keyes is a very rational and very outspoken person. He also speaks of the "Shariah Law" if memory serves me correct. As an economist, he should know well what Shariah Financial Law and other aspects of Shariah Law is all about.
Shalom,
Yacov
Reply to this